Dear Colleagues
I hope that the summer Olympia was successful, and that there have been
numerous enquiries and after sales.
I am pleased to let you know that the Olympia blog has received nearly 550 unique views from
Industry members, who have left constructive points, in the light of Clarion Event’s concerted
efforts to appease the industry.
Some important points have been raised, to which your responses would be greatly valued :-
1. MID-FAIR LULLS
Most comments concern the mid-fair lull. Sharing ideas and ways to increase trade and visitor numbers
during these slower periods could benefit all of us.
2.OBJECT OF THE DAY
During the show, Corfield–Morris arranged the ‘ object of the day ‘ . Feed back about this
initiative might well encourage even more creative ideas for the fair from Tim Corfield and
Daniel Morris.
3.INTERNATIONAL EVENINGS
The organisers would doubtless appreciate responses on the three international evenings staged
during the show.
4.LOCAL AUDIENCE
The area surrounding Olympia is one of the wealthiest enclaves in the United Kingdom.
Your Suggestions on targeted and cost-effective ways, in whcih to encourage local clientele
to return to the Summer and Winter Olympia Shows, would be very much appreciated.
5.POSSIBLE CLOSURE OF OLYMPIA STATION
Thank you for taking the time to post and comment.
Finally, Corfield Morris, Friends of the BADA Trust and The Association of Women
Art Dealers (AWAD) are also aware of the Olympia blog and we look forward to their constructive
input as well. You might like to forward this e-mail to colleagues and former / future Olympians whom you feel may
have an interest / input in moving our long established Summer and Winter Olympia Art and Antiques Fairs forward.
Naturally, I remain available for any questions you may have.
With best wishes,
Elliot Lee
Posted in: Fairs
Ofer Gildor
June 24, 2011
Dear Colleagues
This has been the first year we exhibited in Olympia and we were generally satisfied with the outcome.
Our Gallery deals with Modern Masters and we were part of the small section called “Olympia Contemporary”. I think that it is a great idea to try and bring more Modern and contemporary galleries to Olympia but I’m afraid that it wasn’t enough this year. The mix of new and old is exactly what people are looking for at the moment but the mix needs to be more balanced if the fair wants to attract a younger and newer crowd that don’t usually visits this fair.
In my opinion one of the main reasons for the lack of Modern and Contemporary Galleries is the length of the fair. Most fairs that target this market last for 4 to 5 days only including one weekend. I don’t see any reason why Olympia should be different. We experienced a very strong start of the fair including the preview day and the first weekend. After that, we had very few serious sales including the second weekend. Being away from the gallery for 11 days (plus set up and break down) is a huge disadvantage and I’m sure that many dealers who actually have a gallery will consider exhibiting in Olympia if the fair was shorter.
Best regards,
Ofer Gildor
Gilden’s Arts Gallery
Francesca Fiumano
June 24, 2011
Hi All,
I think it is a great idea to have this forum – the more ideas people put in the better the fair should be!
In terms of the three international evenings – i was not aware of these events – our stand – A03 was a little bit tucked away and i think that in general we had less footfall than other parts of the fair.
As a contemporary art dealer i also think that given that Olympia Contemporary was launched this year there was not a great ‘buzz’ about it. If this is something that is to grow in future years then i think there needs to be a larger group of contemporary dealers present at the fair. I am sure that over time more contemporary dealers will become aware of and interested in the opportunity to exhibit.
I think that the overall the organisers did a great job and was pleased to show at the fair.
Ron - Ashleigh House
July 2, 2011
Hello All,
I have recently reviewed some (but not all) of the posts and comments on the Olympia blog so energetically created and nurtured by Elliot Lee – who I congratulate for his efforts on our behalf.
In meandering through the blog, I have made a few ad-hoc and not necessarily connected jottings.
1. Overall. I am a 10yr + exhibitor and missed last year for price (and Lester) reasons so found the ‘back to basics’ very welcome, producing an excellent and, for me, a reasonably well rewarding Fair. There were several points, positive and negative, that I would like to make.
2. Object of Year, Object of day, tours, lectures. Personally I have a somewhat jaundiced view of all these initiatives. Firstly we must remember why people come – it is to see the dealers and to buy our goods. If they come for these reasons then they are probably of limited value compared with the effort in setting them up and servicing them. If you go to the Tower of London it is nice to see the Ravens but that’s not why you’re there. Secondly these initiatives are usually patronised by visitors who are already there. The job of getting them through the door has been done. It seems folly to distract such visitors from the main task of patronising our stands.
3. International Evenings. My personal verdict is a cautious maybe. This years’ efforts seemed a bit ‘off the mark’ so more drawing board work required if they are to make any viable contribution. They should not be sidelined to out of hours and the periphery in the Pillar Room – perhaps they could be a bit more like old fashioned ‘Charity nights’ and included within in the fair.
4. Clarion Staff. A marked improvement in attitude and helpfulness. Gone is the old ‘take it or leave it philosophy’ replaced by a healthy client-customer mutual respect. Young Rupert saved me a sale, taking a great deal of trouble when I arrived in London N10 at the appointed time with no idea of the customers address.
5. Duration/mid Fair lull. Please, please do not shorten the event. I thought the generally quiet middle days (Monday-Thursday) were reasonably attended. Of course a lot were only spectators but we sold most days and there were reports of sales feeding around pretty regularly. The Lull in the past was assisted by the Grosvenor House factor but that is history so our organisers and PR people have a challenge to improve midweek attendance. This could marry up with comments regarding locals not even knowing about the fair. They, by definition are a prime target. More local advertising, more local posters, advertise in the old fashioned way in London papers, leaflets drops, even (don’t knock it, The Metro). In my opinion potentially far more cost effective than any number of ‘international’ jollies.
6. David Lester. Simple. Keep him far away. Clarion please buy him out.
7. Stand Costs. Someone referred to reducing rates this year. I prefer to see it as correcting the nearly fatal intervention of Lester and a return to sanity. The rates are still too high for the bedrock of traditional exhibitors – just look at the rates 5-10 years ago with the rise in CPI. However, the high footfall and thus the corresponding exhibiting costs per visitor compares favourably with other Fairs. The problem is the sheer level of costs, especially for furniture dealers.
8. The Gallery. Visitors were commenting favourably on the absence of the gallery. It made the Fair easier to navigate and the hike up those stairs was a real turn-off for older people (our principal demographic). They appeared to like the more compact Fair. But to any old experienced exhibitors/fair goers it was quite obvious that there were many phantom stands and voids in the layout. If we had 150 exhibitors this time, I think another 30-50 could be fitted in the present perimeter. Expansion into the new West Hall is not necessarily desirable. It could increase the ‘route march’ effect if the Fair is physically larger for no good reason. It could also unintentionally create a Section1-Section2 divide jeopardising the longer term revival of the Fair.
9. Other Fairs. Art London. Obviously some sort of unified ‘London Fairs in June’ campaign should benefit all involved, but it is probably naive to think that the organisers could co-operate to such effect. Things such as discounted joint tickets, or omnibus complimentarys or give aways at one fair to another are unlikely to happen even though it is a win-win situation given the overlap of dates. Masterpiece. The much later date limits the scope for any meaningful co-operation. So lets just wish them all the best, especially those brave dealers who do both – they deserve success.
10. Olympia Station closure. The Olympia Venue, Clarion (and others like them), BADA, LAPADA must use whatever they can muster by way of lobbying power. Compensate with private shuttle buses from Earls Court and Kensington High Street – but must be regular, 10 minutes is a long time in the rain.
So, as you can see, if you’ve got this far, I offer a bunch of random jottings for what its worth.
I’m optimistic and happy to see Olympia returning to centre stage. See you in November.
Ron Hodgson. Ashleigh House Fine Art.
Robin
July 3, 2011
Hi All ,
I hope that you are well and good to hear from you.
As I mentioned to you about Olympia fair, it would be a good idea for exhibitors ( and the organiser) to have a LIMITED number of VIP Preview tickets , rather than mixing them with ordinary complimentary ones! We want our important clients to feel special and at the same time attract the right clientele rather than mixing them with anybody and everybody !!!
Like yourself, I am exhibiting in September at Lapada fair in Berkeley square. They have a strict rule of giving each exhibitor limited number of VIP complimentary tickets and ordinary ones. You really feel the difference at the preview, with the other days of the fair.
I hope that I made an interesting point that other exhibitors will agree with me.
Kind regards.
Robin Yacoubian