They seem to be everywhere, they are becoming more and more in number and seemingly, there is no shortage of interested artists wishing to participate. What am I talking about? Why, juried shows and juried competitions of course! The question I ask however, is how much do such events really benefit an artist and what might one expect to see by way of return?
Juried shows and competitions have always existed, but in recent years they have become prolific! I lose track of how many email invitations I receive, not counting the numerous announcements on social networks, etc., etc. All of these shows and competitions have one thing in common, they all charge a fee to participate. In recent years it seems to me that artists in particular have become an easy target, presumably because there is no shortage of them and almost all are endeavouring to advance their art careers. As such, the temptation to participate in such events is very great, but does the cost of doing so truly justify the potential (and remember the key word is “potential”!) reward? In a vast majority of cases, I would suggest it does not.
It’s a delicate subject matter, as almost all artists wish to advance themselves and each has there own strategy to do so. Juried shows and competitions are seemingly an obvious way to gain exposure and as such, a small fee (presuming it is a small fee, which is not always the case) seems justified to a great many people. Unfortunately, from what I see on a regular basis, in the vast majority of cases the only people that are really benefiting are the organisers of the events in question. At best, a few select winners will be rewarded via a variety of means, but the other hundreds (and often thousands!) of other participants stand to gain nothing whatsoever. Agreed, not everybody can be a winner, and maybe the fee seems minimal, but in the vast majority of cases, the participating artists are simply lining the pockets of others at their own personal expense. Is this really your objective?
Here come the Judge
As I mentioned earlier, there are literally thousands of such events being proposed, and I could quote examples, but will refrain from doing so. Instead, let us look at a few basic criteria, to try and assist artists to see beyond the publicity blurb and see exactly what they are getting into and what (if anything) they are likely to get out of it. Below is a very brief 10 point check-list, that may prove helpful:-
1. Who are the jury/judges and what are their credentials?
2. Do the members of the jury/judges really have a detailed knowledge of the work they will be reviewing and specifically the work you will be submitting?
3. Are the jury/judges people that you can truly hold in esteem as accredited experts and whose opinions carry valid recognition?
Presuming the answer to 1-3 above is “yes”, let us then also consider the following:-
4. How many people are on the jury/judging panel? In my opinion, less than 3 is not good, because the decisions then become very subjective. However, too many is usually worse!
5. Presuming there is a fee (and there is almost always a fee!), what is the cost of participating and is it truly justified?
6. Does the event benefit from sponsors or advertisers and if so, is that revenue being used to subsidise the event to the benefit of the participants?
7. If I participate, and if I am one of the lucky winners, what do I stand to gain and how will this benefit my career as an artist?
8. If I participate and I am not a winner, do I stand to gain anything at all, or have I simply lost my money?
9. Are there any spin-off benefits to participating and if so what are they?
10. Lastly, do I really want to participate in this event, or is it simply my ego that is driving my rationale?
From a personal perspective, I very rarely participate in any juried shows or competitions, primarily because firstly, I am usually unable to answer the above 10 questions favourably and secondly, because my own career as an artist has (thankfully!) evolved to a stage where I have other options, most of which are more beneficial and with little to no cost to myself (other than my own essential production costs). Notwithstanding, at the outset of my career, I did participate more frequently in such events, albeit on a very selective basis and mostly events with an international focus as opposed to a domestic one. The latter is more personal to me, as my own focus has always been of a global nature, with my own career having always been very cross-boarder.
Other artists may be less concerned with the international nature of the event, but in whatever case, ensure that the event is top-tier within the regional limits of its focus and objective. That is to say, avoid the small, less recognised events, unless there is some unique reason as to why they would be appropriate and thus beneficial to you.
It is a sad reality that the vast majority of all juried shows and competitions are primarily designed to generate vast sums of money to the benefit of the organisers. Rarely are there more than a handful of winners in any of these events and even when the winners are awarded cash sums, it is usually only a fraction of the total revenue that the event has yielded. Ideally, it would be nice to see residual revenue spun across into perhaps parallel or future events, but rarely is this the case. As I mentioned at the outset, artists are seen by a great many as easy targets, and this is understandable, because effectively they generally are!
Thus, before you jump into any such event with both feet, look closely at what it has to offer you. Ask yourself the list of questions referenced above and discriminate as to whether or not you will truly stand to benefit from participating in the event (be it a juried exhibition or a competition). Most of all, do not allow your ego to lead the way and distract you from making a rational decision (which unfortunately, is a common problem for a great many artists!).
Ultimately, if it sounds right, seems right and feels right (in every respect), it probably is right, in which case go for it! Good luck with all of your endeavours to my fellow artists. I hope this article helps you, if only a little, to avoid some of the pitfalls that we all mutually face.
Looking forward to reading your thoughts.
Best wishes from Taiwan,
Thomas










John Brooks
March 3, 2013
A very true summary of what is happening nowadays Thomas and I share just about all your thoughts and feelings about it. In no way trying to justify the events there is one benefit from competing even if you don’t succeed, that I have discovered, that being it can give you a focus and an objective to work towards. In my case I do try to be very selective as your resume above but what it makes me do is to seriously review my work, what I am doing and to re-assess my subject matter on a regular basis which is a good thing. Working towards a goal is great so if a specific theme is offered in a juried show this gives me a challenge and makes me really think about the subject and how to approach it OR to look back at my earlier work based on the theme and to evaluate that work more objectively.
Thankfully in the last 2+ bit years my work has been frequently selected, has won me four international awards and even cash rewards!! Also when you do NOT get selected or win anything it gets you used to rejection which is important to deal with. There is a positive side to rejection in that you tend to reflect on what you submitted and perhaps realise that what you submitted was either not your best work, did not fit the brief sufficiently or the judges had their own agenda and or favourite styles of work. I usually research the work of the judges via their own webites to see what they like or what their own work is like. It is often not difficult to decide that ones own vision might not fit in with their visions or styles so at that point decide not to enter.
But all in all there is some value in some shows and I have benefitted. As a result I have more knowledge and confidence in my own work and how to approach “real life” exhibitions of which I have been lucky with too!
Thomas Hodges (@thomashodges)
March 28, 2013
Thanks for your insight John. As you say, providing one goes into things with their eyes open and thus knowing what they are getting into, then I guess it can provide you spin-off benefits (the likes of which you have outlined). Always remembering that there are numerous other ways to realise the same benefits, which effectively makes it a matter of personal choice.